Posts for the “Responses to CON-sultations” category
Opposing the Counsellors and Psychotherapists (Regulation) and Conversion Therapy Bill
by Julia Evans on August 23, 2018
The letter,, which is reproduced below protests at the introduction of this unnecessary & unwanted bill, has been sent to Dr Wollaston MP who chairs the Parliamentary Health Committee. It (…)
Julia Evans’ response to Public Health England (a UK Government Department)’s survey on ‘Healthcare Professionals: Work as a Health Outcome’
by Julia Evans on March 10, 2018
This text and link were sent to Dr Sarah Wollaston MP, Chair of the Health and Social Care Committee. A receipt was received on 12th March 2018 at 18:17 which confirms (…)
Julia Evans’ contribution to the Department of Health’s October 2017 consultation
by Julia Evans on January 18, 2018
Julia Evans’ contribution to the Department of Health’s consultation was sent on 18th January 2017 at 11:49:14 GMT. Confirmation of receipt received 18 January 2018 at 15:14:12 GMT. Julia Evans’ (…)
The National Audit Office’s investigation into the performance data of IAPT services.
by Julia Evans on August 14, 2017
So I got to be so laid-back, I completely mistook the date. Nonetheless, the following has been sent within the National Audit Office. Its receipt has not been acknowledged. Have (…)
Two letters for your attention: the bps tells Parliament why it should not be swallowed whole into the domain of the Privy Council & Earl Howe, the Government’s Standards Zsar within Health, commands a reply to 3 of my emails.
by Julia Evans on November 13, 2012
Hello, 1) This post gives the British Psychological Society’s position on statutory regulation as at 9th January 2009, before the matter was debated in the House of Lords. They did not want it, (…)
The exchange between Earl Howe, the Department of Health and Julia Evans during October. My reply will be posted shortly.
by Julia Evans on October 30, 2012
1. Introduction 2. Background on Earl Howe – his responsibilities 3. Earl Howe drives standards into social care via NICE 4. Department of Health’s reply of 30th October 2012, sent (…)
CHRE(PSA) trumpets its success in creating a ghetto of wellbeing practitioners who are compliant (for a fee) to the Government’s fantasy of safeguarding.
by Julia Evans on October 3, 2012
Contents: 1. Introductory questions 2. The CHRE(PSA) 3rd October 2012 circulation 3. Attachments to the CHRE(PSA) circulation of 3rd October 2012 (i) Accredited Voluntary registers: Standards for organisations holding a (…)
CHRE (PSA) reports on how they are progressing in their regulatory capture of ‘talking therapists’ onto their ‘voluntary registers’ regulated by statute…….
by Julia Evans on September 17, 2012
Please find below Stop Press At the bottom of this post is a message received from within Parliament, in response to the circulation of this post. Any further correspondence will (…)
The ‘Fat Controllers’ in the DoH dictate THE law with the agreement of both Houses of Parliament
by Julia Evans on August 13, 2012
The DoH’s response to Bruce Scott’s open letter sent to the CHRE’s CON-sultation. Available here Open Letter to the CHRE/PSA on Accreditation Standards or here Bruce Scott receives a reply, from within (…)
The CHRE/PSA receives over 400 responses to its CON-sultation on Accreditation Standards (Voluntary Registers)
by Julia Evans on July 20, 2012
Thank you to all who sent in their contribution. The following is the CHRE/PSA’s acknowledgement mail. Also below are links to my response, Bruce Scott’s response and the original CON-sultation (…)
